![]() That finding is what caused Steele to become alarmed and go to the FBI, and it caused the FBI to take the dossier seriously as that's a serious allegation. It's not our fault that they give it that much credit. Other investigations noted that the dossier was correct on that point. Are you suggesting that there was some other finding that was more significant? Steele got it right on that point before the public really knew this. Peter Gulutzan ( talk) 22:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC) I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at. confirming the Trump campaign’s collusion with Russia.", It's all about Trump/Russia." I'd go further and say Putin's preference wasn't even a "finding" of the dossier and is not worth mentioning, so let's see whether Valjean gets consensus for "main" and whether there's consensus to keep the clause. "he continued to profess that the central assertion of the dossier - that the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 campaign - was not only possible but a fact.", Steele’s main allegation has proven not just true but prophetic. "Danchenko was a key source for the Steele dossier’s core allegations that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election.". I agree with Adoring nanny, the word "main" is just the opinion of a Newsweek writer, and it's easy to find opinion sources that the main point was Trump/Russia collusion e.g. Adoring nanny on November 8 removed the word "main" from an earlier version with slightly different wording, but Valjean soon put it back with edit summary = "RS accurately assert that this is the main finding of the dossier". The article currently has "Some aspects of the dossier have been corroborated, in particular its main finding that Putin and Russia actively favored Trump over Clinton" etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |